If you want better outputs, you do not need more prompts. You need a better prompt structure.
This is a lightweight framework you can apply to almost any task. It is intentionally short so you actually use it.
The 7 elements (in plain English)
- Outcome: What you want at the end, in one sentence. Not "help me", but "produce X."
- Audience: Who is the output for and how sophisticated are they?
- Context: Only what changes the answer (facts, constraints, background).
- Role: What kind of expert should the model behave like (analyst, coach, editor, architect).
- Constraints: Length, format, tone, and what to avoid.
- Success criteria: How you will judge a good answer (accuracy, completeness, actionability).
- Verification: Ask for assumptions, uncertainty flags, and what would need checking.
The professional move is the last element: verification. It turns "confident nonsense" into "useful, labeled output."
A fast way to apply it
When you are in a hurry, use a two-line version:
- Line 1: Outcome + audience
- Line 2: Constraints + verification request
This keeps quality high without writing a novel each time.
Want the full GPT-5 Prompting Playbook?
Get the complete set of examples and the printable checklist.
Get GPT-5 Playbook
If your issue is inconsistency, not ideas...
The Lite Power Guide installs "default behavior" that makes structure automatic, so you stop retyping the same standards.
Get Lite Guide